Comments on: Flash vs. HTML5

By: stonee

stonee — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:25:27 +0000

I can’t understand “adobe vs html5″ that is discussing in the internet, here and there, especially, when jobs declared that the outstanding tablet, ipad, won’t support adobe. I have an impression of adobe that it can play any videos with different video format, in opposite, html5 supports h.246 (According browser publishers’ will) someone thought html5 should take 10 years before replacing adobe in the areas like games, desktop widgets, e-learning interactivities and many applications that require advanced animation API or techniques. As ifunia lists in their official website, html5 can’t replace adobe at once, because “74% of the web can’t be seen on the iPad” (that means you have to convert videos by 3rd-party video converter like ifunia and handbrake), ipad needs help, let alone html5! So, adobe is necessary for our digital life all the same.

By: Google Logo

Google Logo — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:52:25 +0000

Awesome put up, can you guys please help me crack this new Google code they used for their logo? It’s in HTML5…

By: We shall prevail. | Cool websites that do everything.

We shall prevail. | Cool websites that do everything. — Tue, 04 May 2010 12:42:00 +0000

[...] The Flash Platform provides a runtime environment on the web, allowing developers to build software on top of it. We’ve been saying this for years. Finally, there has been some educated experimentation from the Flash community. The best examples illustrated here by Todd Williams who took the time to compare HTML5 to Flash in great detail [Source] [...]